<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Customers, Clients or Captive?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reliable.esymmetrix.com/management/customers-clients-or-captive/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reliable.esymmetrix.com/management/customers-clients-or-captive</link>
	<description>People, Processes, Hardware and Software that deliver results every time, every where.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 18:58:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://reliable.esymmetrix.com/management/customers-clients-or-captive/comment-page-1#comment-1028</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kendall.srellim.org/?p=21#comment-1028</guid>
		<description>I completely agree; acting as customer/vendor attempts to leverage the virtues of a marketplace where one doesn&#039;t really exist.  And you probably don&#039;t really want one either.

Chargeback is great as a means to reconcile business units&#039; IT and other costs with their revenue, but attempting to use it as a way to make IT pseudo profit center is a bad plan.  Chargeback also only makes sense when a division has significant control over the cost (i.e. don&#039;t bother to tie back costs that aren&#039;t going to positively influence division behavior).  

If (for instance) every employee is required to have an email license than it&#039;s just silly to charge that back.  But if employees get to chose between multiple laptop/desktop models with significant cost variation, then that makes sense to report at the manager/department/division level to drive frugal behavior.

However, even with this &#039;client&#039; model, IT people should also remember that they are part of the business as a whole, and should be looking out for the overall needs of the business as well as the expressed needs of any particular project or division (including their own; don&#039;t confuse your team with the business as a whole).  

Employees acting as owners of the business  is one of the good points of having employees rather than outsource contracts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree; acting as customer/vendor attempts to leverage the virtues of a marketplace where one doesn&#8217;t really exist.  And you probably don&#8217;t really want one either.</p>
<p>Chargeback is great as a means to reconcile business units&#8217; IT and other costs with their revenue, but attempting to use it as a way to make IT pseudo profit center is a bad plan.  Chargeback also only makes sense when a division has significant control over the cost (i.e. don&#8217;t bother to tie back costs that aren&#8217;t going to positively influence division behavior).  </p>
<p>If (for instance) every employee is required to have an email license than it&#8217;s just silly to charge that back.  But if employees get to chose between multiple laptop/desktop models with significant cost variation, then that makes sense to report at the manager/department/division level to drive frugal behavior.</p>
<p>However, even with this &#8216;client&#8217; model, IT people should also remember that they are part of the business as a whole, and should be looking out for the overall needs of the business as well as the expressed needs of any particular project or division (including their own; don&#8217;t confuse your team with the business as a whole).  </p>
<p>Employees acting as owners of the business  is one of the good points of having employees rather than outsource contracts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 2.421 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-09 08:43:47 -->

